Loading...
 
Mediterr J Rheumatol 2018;29(4):207-10
Functional Status in Knee Osteoarthritis and its Relation to Demographic and Clinical Features
Authors Information

1. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
2. Medical Students, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the functional status in a cohort of Iraqi patients with knee Osteoarthritis (OA) and its relation to demographic and clinical features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 patients with knee OA diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology Criteria for classification knee OA. Patients’ age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, educational level, and disease duration were recorded. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was used to measure functional status of patients with knee OA. RESULTS: A total of 150 (97 females) patients with knee OA were recruited in the study. The mean age of patients was 52.5±10.1 year and mean BMI was 30.3±6.0 kg/m2. The mean of total WOMAC score was 8.05±2.10 (Range 3-12). The mean WOMAC of: pain score was 3.22 ±0.76 (1-4), stiffness score was 2.05±1.01 and for functional disability score was 2.79±0.88. There was a positive significant correlation between age of the patients and severity of knee OA assessed with total WOMAC score (p=0.026). However, there was a significant negative correlation between educational level and total WOMAC score (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Functional status in knee OA was impaired and there was a statistically positive significant correlation between age of the patients and severity of knee OA with functional impairment. Also, significant negative correlation was demonstrated between educational level and functional impairment.
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common chronic degenerative joint disorder and a major public health problem associated with cartilage degeneration and joint deformity, leading to joint pain and subsequent impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).1,2 Knee OA, one of the most common forms of OA, is considered a leading cause of disability worldwide and associated with high morbidity and mortality.3,4 Most OA patients suffer from great changes in their activities of daily living (ADL), and approximately 25% of them have some kind of functional limitation, such as morning stiffness, reduced joint motion, crepitus, and muscle atrophy.5
A number of previous studies have reported significant association between severity of knee OA and functional status6-8 and knee pain was considered an independent predictor of disability.9 To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on functional status of knee OA among Iraqi patients. The aim of this study was to assess the functional status in patients with knee OA and its relation to demographic and clinical features.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study design
This cross-sectional study was carried out from 1st March-1st October 2017 in Baghdad Teaching Hospital / Rheumatology outpatient clinic.


Patients selection
A total of 150 consecutive patients with knee OA, diagnosed by a rheumatologist according to revised ACR criteria for classification of OA of the knee,10 were selected and included in the study. The patients who had chronic diseases (e.g., cardiac disease, liver diseases and renal disease) and inflammatory disease that may affect knee OA were excluded.

 

Data collection and evaluation
The data were collected using structured questionnaire form and included age, job, weight, height, gender, and smoking status. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was used to measure the functional status. The questionnaire form was filled by personal interview with each patient. WOMAC is a self-administered health status measure that assesses the dimensions of pain, stiffness and function (either separately or as an overall). It is available in 5-point Likert, 11- point numerical rating and 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) formats.11 The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales:

  • Pain (5 items): during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing
  • Stiffness (2 items): after first waking and later in the day
  • Physical Function (17 items): stair use, rising from sitting, standing, bending, walking, getting in / out of a car, shopping, putting on / taking off socks, rising from bed, lying in bed, getting in / out of bath, sitting, getting on / off toilet, heavy household duties, light household duties.

The patient’s response to each question produces a score that is then summed to derive an aggregated score for each dimension and a total score (WOMAC index) that reflects disability overall.11


Ethical approval and patient consent
Informed consent was obtained from each participant included in this study according to the declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was taken from Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad and the purpose of the study was explained to each participant prior to interview and all the patients accepted to participate in the study.

 

Statistics analysis
Anderson-Darling test was used to assess the adherence of continuous data for normal distribution. Age and body mass index (BMI) followed the normal distribution, while the rest of the variables did not follow normal distribution. Mean and standard deviation was used for normally distributed data, and median and interquartile range was utilized for non-normally distributed data. T-test was used to compare means between two groups in normally distributed data, while Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Chi square test was used for discrete variables to test the association, binary logistic regression analysis was used to obtain the odds ratio that describes the relationship between dichotomous variables, and multivariate logistic regression used to see if significant variable was independent. P-values smaller than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. The statistical calculations were performed with SPSS version 21 software package and Minitab.

 

RESULTS

A total of 150 (97 females) patients with knee OA were involved in the study. The mean age was 52.5+-10.1 year and mean BMI was 30.3 +- 6.0 kg/2. The other baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
The mean of total WOMAC score was 8.05 ± 2.10 (3-12). The mean WOMAC of pain score was 3.22 +- 0.76 )1-4), stiffness score was 2.05 +- 1.01 and for functional disability score was 2.79 +- 0.88 as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1.
There was positive significant correlation between age of the patients, severity of knee OA measured by Kellgren-Lawrence scale with total WOMAC score. In addition, a significant negative correlation between educational level and Total WOMAC score was established (Table 2).

 

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the participants.
 

 
Figure 1. Error bar chart shows functional status in Knee osteoarthritis.
 


Table 2. Effect of baseline characteristics on Total WOMAC score using multiple linear regressions analysis.
 


DISCUSSION

Knee OA is a major global burden and cause of impaired health related quality of life12 and associated with important economic costs and health losses.13,14 This is the first study assessing health related quality of life in patients with knee OA in Iraq. This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between the functional status in patients with knee OA with the demographic and clinical features.
There was positive significant correlation between age of the patients, severity of knee OA with total WOMAC score. The quality of life in patients with knee OA is considerably impaired as a result of the chronic degenerative nature of the disease being an inevitable consequence of growing old. In OA, degradation and loss of the articular cartilage is a central feature that is sometimes attributed to "wear and tear".15
The findings of the current study are in line with previous ones1,2 reporting that knee pain, stiffness and duration of disease may affect the functionality in patients with OA. Consequently, it would be better to consider the functional status of patients in parallel with clinical and radiological findings in daily clinical practice.2
Worse function was observed in elderly women suffering from OA, and the drug treatment did not result in any improvement regarding the functional status of those patients. In this context, studies on different therapeutic modalities aiming to improve function and quality of life for elderly people must be fostered.16
In the current study, there was a significant negative correlation between educational level and health related quality of life of knee OA (Total WOMAC score). Similar findings were reported by previous studies in which the low educational level was associated with impaired patients’ quality of life and increased symptomatic knee osteoarthris.17,18
This study has some limitations: most of the patients were not able to recall their symptoms retrospectively, so it is important to consider a recall bias. In addition, it was a cross-sectional study, so we could not assess the cause and effect relationship between variables and small sample. In spite of these limitations, this study was the first in Iraq to assess functional status in knee OA patients with strict inclusions and exclusions criteria.
In conclusion,functional quality of life was impaired in patients with knee OA.There was positive significant correlation between age of the patients, severity of knee OA measured by Kellgren-Lawrence scale with total WOMAC score and a significant negative correlation between educational level and Total WOMAC score. Such observations would be taken into account when treating patients with knee OA in routine rheumatology clinics.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Uchio Y, Enomoto H, Alev L, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial of duloxetine in Japanese patients with knee pain due to osteoarthritis. J Pain Res 2018;11:809. [https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S164128] [PMCID: PMC5912377]
  2. Cubukcu D, Sarsan A, Alkan H. Relationships between pain, function and radiographic findings in osteoarthritis of the knee: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis 2012;2012:984060. [https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/984060] [PMCID: PMC3506881]
  3. Veronese N, Trevisan C, De Rui M, et al. Association of osteoarthritis with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases in the elderly. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1136-44. [https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39564] [PMID: 26714002]
  4. Litwic A, Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull 2013;105:185-99. [http://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/lds038] [PMCID: PMC3690438]
  5. Corti CM, Rigon C. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact. Aging Clin Exper Res 2003;15:359-63. [PMID: 14703001]
  6. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Defining arthritis and measuring functional status in elders: methodological issues in the study of disease and physical disability. Am J Public Health 1990;80945-9.  [PMCID: PMC1404793] [PMID: 2368855]
  7. Hopman‐Rock M, Odding E, Hofman A, et al. Physical and psychosocial disability in elderly subjects in relation to pain in the hip and/or knee. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1037-44. [PMID: 8782137]
  8. Jordan JM, Luta G, Renner J, et al. Knee pain and knee osteoarthritis severity in self reported task specific disability: the Johnstone County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol 1997; 24:1344-9. [PMID: 9228135]
  9. Davis MA, Ettinger W, Neuhaus J, Mallon KP. Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from the NHANES I epidemiological follow up study. J Rheumatol 1991;18:591-8. [PMID: 2066950]
  10.  Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheumatol 1986;29:1039-49.  [PMID: 3741515]
  11. Woolacott NF, Corbett MS, Rice SJ. The use and reporting of WOMAC in the assessment of the benefit of physical therapies for the pain of osteoarthritis of the knee: findings from a systematic review of clinical trials. Rheumatology 2012;51:1440-6. [https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes043] [PMID: 22467082]
  12. Abbott JH, Usiskin IM, Wilson R, Hansen P, Losina E. The quality-of-life burden of knee osteoarthritis in New Zealand adults: A model-based evaluation. PLoS One 2017;12:e0185676. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185676] [PMID: 29065119] [PMCID: PMC5655469]
  13. Losina E, Paltiel AD, Weinstein AM, et al. Lifetime medical costs of knee osteoarthritis management in the United States: impact of extending indications for total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 2015;67:203-15. [https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22412] [PMID: 25048053] [PMCID: PMC4422214]
  14. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1323-30. [https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763] [PMID: 24553908]
  15. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40. [PMID: 3068365]
  16. Santos JP, Andraus RA, Pires-Oliveira DA, et al. Analysis of functional status of elderly with osteoarthritis. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa 2015;22:161-8.
  17. Callahan LF, Shreffler J, Siaton BC, et al. Limited educational attainment and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the Johnston County (North Carolina) Osteoarthritis Project. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R46. [http://doi.org/10.1186/ar2956] [PMCID: PMC2888194] [PMID: 20298606]
  18. Callahan LF, Cleveland RJ, Shreffler J, et al. Associations of educational attainment, occupation and community poverty with knee osteoarthritis in the Johnston County (North Carolina) osteoarthritis project. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R169. [https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3492[PMCID: PMC3612553] [PMID: 23225374]